• About
  • Approach
  • Plays
  • Past Projects
    • The Skriker
    • Hamlet
    • Vinegar Tom
  • Resume
  • Current Projects

Courtney Meaker

~ dramaturg, director, writer

Courtney Meaker

Monthly Archives: April 2012

Fear and Queer with Cherdonna and Lou

16 Monday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in response, shows

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

cherdonna and lou, jody kuehner, queer performance theory, ricki mason, velocity dance center

In terms of Seattle theatre, I try to adhere to two rules: 1) I never waste my time with a show that adds nothing to the current cultural mythology (see: Neil Simon), and 2) I never miss an opportunity to see queer performance.

Lucky for me, I attended the one night only show of Cherdonna and Lou‘s out out there (A Whole Night Lost) at Velocity Dance Center, which satisfied both.

Working from the concept of fear (and using a Friday the 13th performance to their advantage) Jody Kuehner and Ricki Mason (Cherdonna and Lou, respectively) created a genre-mixed gang bang that simultaneously terrified and tickled. Dressed in their typical drag personas and monster masks, and at one point, performing nude, they melted elements of Hollywood horror and atypical fears with dance, humor, politics, and queer theory (Yes, I’m about to stand on my “Queer performance theory is awesome” soapbox, see below) for one truly incredible night of performance.

Read more.

Have You Ridden Seattle Rep’s Or, Yet?

05 Thursday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in response, shows

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

aphra behn, liz duffy adams, or, seattle rep

After seeing Or, (through April 22 at Seattle Rep; tickets) for the first time, I screamed over Twitter, “I want to ride it again!” Because it is a ride, make no mistake. It’s a joy-filled, extravagant roller coaster with sex, glam rock, spies, and theatricality. Now, after seeing it again, I have a plea: Liz Duffy Adams, writer of this amazingly funny and smart work, can we please be best friends?

Read the rest after the jump.

Free & Cheap this Month in Theatre

04 Wednesday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in community, writing

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

free and cheap, the sunbreak

First post is up at The SunBreak. Here’s a little excerpt. 

April looks like a good month for Free and Cheap theatre. There’s a mix of things–readings, dogs, Judas, superheroes, Chay Yew, and women. Lots of women. Here’s a culled list of Pay What You Can, $12 and under, or free performances and readings happening in April.

Read the rest behind the jump.

February, part three: Lewis & Clark, I Am My Own Wife, and Scenes from an Execution

02 Monday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in response, shows

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

annex theatre, i am my own wife, new century theatre company, pipeline, scenes from an execution, seattle rep, the thrilling adventures of the famous lewis and clark

The Thrilling Adventures of the Famous Lewis and Clark! at Annex

Lewis and Clark was historical inaccuracy for fun. However, there were only two female characters in the entire show, one of which did not speak, and the other was flatly written. Considering there were at least nine or ten male characters who had substantial stage-time this was a little annoying, especially since the female who did speak was essentially just a sex-symbol. For future re-writes I would encourage them to flesh out these two female roles considering two non-interesting female characters balanced against ten speaking and fully formed male characters sends a disconcerting message. Beautifully choreographed stage combat and smart humor mixed with typical “BOOBZ” humor made for a fun evening of theatre. It was tasty cotton candy with Zorro for flare.

I Am My Own Wife at Seattle Rep

One man shows are tricky beasts even under the best circumstances. More often than not, they seem to be the territory of self-indulgent, heterosexual, white men, which is tedious to listen to for an hour and a half, if for no other reason than we’ve heard that perspective before, and it’s already inescapable. For those reasons, I’m happy that Seattle Rep decided to put on I Am My Own Wife. Even though it also depicts a white, male-ish perspective, the show is more about a queer and questionable experience. Queer voices on stage (especially of women, trans, or non-white persons) are hard to come by. The story was compelling and Nick Garrison performed wonderfully across all roles. Additionally, the sound, lighting, and set added breath-taking moments to the experience. This is never surprising of Seattle Rep. If there’s one thing they know how to do, it’s design. On the whole, I’m happy the Rep is branching out into queer stories that don’t hand the audience a conclusion. However, I’d love to see more female stories on their stage period. So, if they’re going to continue to have one-man shows, why not make them one-woman? Or, better yet, a one-queer-black-woman show? Know anyone who could write that?

Scenes from an Execution with New Century Theatre’s Pipeline Series at Solo 

Scenes from an Execution started out as a radio play, and then the author developed it into a staged version. Had I not been told this, I feel I still would have come to the same conclusion, which is that I’m not sure what’s added to the piece by performing it in a fully staged production. Though the characterization and artistic rants were compelling, there was no action that could truly make it viable staged. Not that philosophical arguments about aesthetics aren’t interesting; they are. But they are something I’d rather read or listen to than watch. There was very little conflict in the piece mostly because the artist’s imprisonment is late in the play, relatively short, and leads nowhere. She’s not even close to execution. Thematically, the play was well-structured, and the arguments/comparisons of art and war inspired many “mms” from the audience. Ultimately, the play was enjoyable as a reading, but I don’t feel it would stand up well as a fully staged production.

February, part two: White Hot, The Bells, and Grotesque Animal

02 Monday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in response, shows

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

erickson theatre, grotesque animal, on the boards, strawberry theatre workshop, the bells, west of lenin, white hot

Here’s the continuation of short show responses for February. Sorry for the delay. Hopefully I will have caught up through March by the end of this week, and then go back to writing longer pieces about the shows I see. Also, I’m writing for The SunBreak, so look out for my debut piece later this week.

White Hot at West of Lenin

After seeing White Hot my first thought was, “Ah. There’s your backbone, Seattle theatre.” If there’s one thing White Hot had it was spine, cojones even. But aside from the shock value of seeing something new for the current Seattle theatre scene, there was a lot to love and debate about White Hot. The design was phenomenal to the point where scene changes and transitions made me sit up a little taller in my seat. Though the show spelled out “the message” overtly in a monologue (this is a show about despicable, unlikable people with a no-hope ending) I found myself compelled to watch on. The shock and violence of the piece was not exactly new, but was well-executed. And the actors handled sprawling intense dialogue with ferocity. Overall, it was a play that did not passively act on you; engagement needed to happen and dialogue about it was necessary to fully process what it accomplished. I would love to see more shows that aspire to shake-up audiences. Also, shout out to the skills of Ray Tagavilla. I’ve only seen him in two productions (the other being Lie of the Mind) but I’m amazed at how captivating he was for a relatively small part. I want to see more of him on the Seattle stage.

Strawshop’s The Bells at Erickson Theatre

I heard a reading of this play many, many months ago when I worked at Intiman as a House Manager. I remember hearing it and thinking, “This is good, but a slow pace would kill it.” There’s not a lot of action. And because you guess early on that the “twist” is not so much a twist as the inevitable direction, it’s important for the rest of the story to move at a steady clip. That’s where Strawshop lost me a bit. Though the play was well-acted, designed, and directed, they decided to keep the pauses long and pointed. The same happened for the transitions even though the transitions were using opposite sides of the stage. The lights had to fully black out (usually at 3-5 second fade time) before the lights would go up on the second half of the stage (again, at a 3-5 second fade time). This made for a longer piece with less weight. The set design was phenomenal balancing between realism, and suggestion of snow and mountain terrain. The sound, especially the bells themselves, was haunting.

El Pasado es un animal grotesco at On the Boards

The turntable of time going around for a ten-year span was surprisingly captivating especially considering the production was based in narration as opposed to action. Despite that (or, perhaps because of it) there were many moments of laughter and calls to action. The themes of transformation, progression, separation, and falsely presenting a persona connected the separate story threads over the backdrop of political upheaval in Argentina. Clear parallels from the decade the author describes in Argentina to our contemporary decade in America compelled the piece throughout, though the narration never makes the comparison directly. And though, I don’t think the intention was to have the piece show how “we are all one,” I liked that the production was different things to different people. On the Boards is a force to be reckoned with, and I’m continually amazed at what they bring to their stage.

Why, First Date, why?

02 Monday Apr 2012

Posted by cmeak in response, shows

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

act theatre, first date

This response was written about a preview performance of First Date I saw in March. I fully acknowledge the play may have changed over the preview process, but I’m assuming the bulk of the writing did not, which is really my only problem with the play. 

I’m disappointed in you. You know who you are. You are the people who wrote the book and lyrics for ACT’s new musical First Date. You are the people who decided that writing a new musical didn’t need interesting revelations about dating, or evolution of communication between men and women, or character development. No. Not you. You decided to pull out every painful stereotype and cliché paired with catchy music for a truly depressing array of insipid inanity.

I have been told that I hate fun. This is not true. I party. I dance. I crack inappropriate jokes at awkward times. I like stand-up. I barbecue. I do not hate fun; I hate stupidity. There’s a difference. I enjoy smart humor and witty dialogue. I will admit that musicals are not my favorite thing in the world. However, because I grew up on musicals, I can appreciate them for what they are while hoping that they will continue to evolve to tell better stories rather than stick with tropes that worked 100 years ago.

I had high hopes for First Date: The Musical. For one thing, I love ACT. I like that they bring in new work and that a good portion of that new work is local. I like that they are pushing beyond the same tired shows over and over again (I’m looking at you, Glass Menagerie). But I am horrified First Date could be put on stage in 2012. Because I want all theatre to aspire for greater truth, even if that greater truth is just a new way to tell a love story in a funny and compelling manner, I feel this needs to be said. I would also like to note that I know I’m not their target audience. I know they didn’t care if I liked it. They knew the general population would, or at least hoped they would, and judging by the reviews and the people I sat with in the audience that night, they were right.

Brief synopsis: Aaron and Casey are set up on a blind date by mutual friends. Aaron is a comically nerdy numbers guy, while Casey is the artsy one. (Because why bother doing something different when you can pull out the old standby?) Throughout the date they have to battle the voices of their exes and best friends to figure out if this relationship is worth pursuing.

What I liked about the show:

  • Strong singing skills. Even when I hated what the songs were saying, they sounded great.
  • Overall talented ensemble including director, actors, designers, musicians, etc. Your efforts made the piece bearable.
  • Music was compelling and catchy. I defy you to get “Bail Out” out of your head.
  • Choreography and staging was fun, energetic, and sometimes truly creative. They used the space well.
  • Using friends as devices to force Aaron and Casey to air their hangups was a nice framework, and was the perfect structure to highlight the thoughts of the two daters.
  • The premise of a first date is perfect fodder for a musical.

Considering there was a lot of good, it’s hard for me to describe what followed. But the problem stemmed entirely from moronic writing and easy laughs based on tired clichés and stereotypes about how men and women don’t understand each other. If the writing had been better, this show would have been an entertaining night of theatre at the very least.

I will preface these next lists by saying had the play done only a few of these things, it would not have been awful. But feeling the need to do them all in succession and seemingly without any thought toward the implications made for a thoroughly aggravating experience.

Clichés:

  • Aaron’s ex left him at the altar. They tried to make this not the same thing you see only in sitcoms by instead saying that he was left at that the chuppah. Now that’s comedy.
  • The homosexual male best friend of Casey calls her “bitch,” “slut,” and “whore” on every phone message he leaves because that’s the only type of homosexual ever to get stage or screen time.
  • Casey wants to order a burger, but instead orders a salad. They try to turn this into relevancy by saying that Aaron really wants to order a salad, but he orders a burger. I bet you can’t guess what happens next. Yup, that’s right. They switched plates. How would anyone see that coming?!
  • Casey is a photographer but hasn’t actually taken photographs in many years because she’s afraid of being bad at it and revealing too much of herself. She’s essentially a self-defeating stereotype of a woman too afraid to commit to anything because she’s got abandonment issues. Groan.
  • By the end of the show we don’t know much about the characters, which could be fitting into the first date model. However, because they bring Casey’s therapist on stage to talk about her daddy issues, and Aaron reads a letter from his dead mother, I would think that having some more character development would be in order.
  • Casey’s sexual history comes up and surprise, surprise, she’s not a virgin. And because she’s had sex with more than one person her whole life, it’s insinuated that she’s a slut. In fact, the first slut joke comes about 10 minutes into the show. I’d also point out that his sex history is not discussed. We only know that he dated the ex-fiance. His sexual history is not up for debate; why is hers?
  • A biological clock ticks for Casey. Seriously.

Desperate attempts to make this show seem relevant:

  • Song about Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. and how you can’t escape it. Sorry, I live now. Who doesn’t know this?
  • Song about who pays for the check. Did you know that the reason men and women don’t know what to do about the check is because of feminism? Well, I’m glad there was a song to point that one out for me. God. Aren’t feminists the worst?
  • Joke about Newt Gingrich, or some other prominent republican possibly winning the election. Granted no one wants that.

Okay, now we get to the overall message the show tried to push. Here are the unpleasant stereotypes it could not see beyond. I’d again like to say, that had only a few of these happened, this would not have been that bad. But all of these combined to form one production. In 2012.

Stereotypes about women:

Women hate their bodies. In the first song, within the first verse, we hear a woman complain about her body. I believe it was something about her thighs, but there were so many negative things women said about their bodies that it’s hard to remember which came first. After this incident, it was moment after moment of fat-shaming, or negative body image. Casey professes to love her body and not be ashamed to order the burger she really wants because she’s so “tough,” “artsy,” and “edgy” (these are also the only words Aaron ever uses to describe her). But Casey is convinced to order a salad by her best friend (voice in her head) because she’s single and will always be single if she orders that burger because the man will see it as a portent for things to come. There were many more moments, small and subtle as they always are, smugly insinuating that no matter how we may protest to love our bodies, we are actually all insecure little girls thinking this dress makes us look fat. There was also a particularly disturbing moment when Aaron rants about his ex. While some of that song depicts horrible actions the ex did while they were in a relationship, he spends significantly more time describing problems with her body and sexuality, like her growing double chin, chunky thighs, and her ineptitude at sex because she didn’t worship his penis.

Women love bad boys because bad boys treat them poorly. Oh yeah. Women love them some bad boys. Especially when they forget their birthdays, rip them off, cheat, disappear for days, etc. They can’t get enough of that because bad boys have big penises (yes, they sang that).

Women have daddy issues. After the bad boy song, Casey decides she doesn’t want to date Aaron because he is not a bad boy and women only want bad boys, ladies. As she’s about to leave Best Friend intervenes asking Casey what her therapist says about “all this”. So, Casey sings about how Mommy and Daddy never loved her, and though both her mother and father are mentioned in the song, clearly it’s Daddy’s love she’s seeking. Cause women can’t ever be women without some Daddy issues. It’s also probably why we like bad boys.

Women are a slave to the biological clock. We can’t help it. The clock ticks (in this show the clock actually ticked). We need a man. We need babies. Cause we’re not getting any younger. So, why not settle? Huh? Come on. He’s nice. He has a good job. Isn’t that enough? Apparently, yes it is.

Stereotypes about men:

Men don’t understand women. We are largely getting this story from Aaron’s perspective. Even though we can take rides in both Casey and Aaron’s heads, make no mistake, this show is about Aaron. And Aaron thinks women are tricky. Women are complicated. Women don’t know what they want. And he thinks this because he’s a man and that’s what men think, right? Dear writers of this show: all people are complicated and difficult to figure out. It’s not about how men don’t understand women, or that women don’t understand men. It’s that sometimes we don’t understand ourselves and that makes it harder to empathize with anyone who’s doing something differently than we would. But that’s not nearly as funny as the same, “God, women are so complicated! What am I going to do? [laugh track]”

Heterosexual men can be conned into doing anything if you call them gay. Want to know how Aaron’s best friend (voice in his head) convinces him to order that burger? Calling him gay. Yup. That’s how you do it. Because homosexual men aren’t manly, right? They don’t order burgers. They only eat salads. Because women only eat salad, and gay men are essentially women. Facepalm.

Homosexual men are all limp-wristed and effeminate. There was one gay man in this show until the end. I was willing to excuse the token effeminate gay male because there were so many other things to be mad about (like no mention of queer women at all) but when the gay best friend shows up to the bar to find Casey, who does he find but another effeminate gay man! And who are the voices in their heads? Effeminate gay men! All with limp-wrists and lisps! Yay! See, we’re cultured! We know what gay men are like.

Men have issues because of Mom. Aaron has issues because his mom was so “career-driven” and busy at work that she didn’t spend any time with him at home. This is something that is said on stage in 2012 in a CONTEMPORARY musical. Moms man, they’re the worst. Amirite? What I’m assuming is the writers had originally done a “Cats and the Cradle” thing with Aaron’s backstory, but then someone had the brilliant idea of changing it from Dad to Mom because that will make the play feel more “real,” and then NO ONE THOUGHT ABOUT WHAT THAT WOULD SAY. I am giving them the benefit of the doubt. I’m thinking maybe they just didn’t think about it, instead of actively saying to themselves, “Yeah. Moms with careers suck. They don’t spend time with their children.” Do you know how vitriolic the words he used about this situation sounded? His mom was too busy with her career after sacrificing her body to birth him that she missed a couple of his home games. I’m so sorry your mother wanted to work. That must have been devastating for you.

At that point, there was no hope left for me liking this musical. Believe me when I say that there was more than what I’ve written here. More un-insightful jokes. More gross depictions of men and women. I wish I did like it. No. That’s not right. I wish they had written something smart. I wish they had written something that would flip theses stereotypes into something new, that would comment on how dating culture is bizarre, awkward, and yes, funny. I wish they had written something that balked at cliché instead of going for the easy laugh, that actually dared to talk about the difficulty of human connection. I firmly believe you can do this with humor, because you know what? People are funny without resorting to the same “Let’s get laid” jokes that permeate the romcom and in part, this musical. But no. That would not be the story the writers of First Date wanted, because that would have assumed that audiences wouldn’t find jokes about how women and men don’t understand each other funny.

 

♣ Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

♣ Recent Posts

  • Chaotic, Melodramatic, Western Musical Seeks an Audience that Can Keep Up
  • See the World Through K.’s Eyes at New Century’s Creepy, Erotic “Trial”
  • Theater Schmeater Takes on McDonagh’s Brutal “Behanding in Spokane”
  • “Undo” at Annex Theatre on Things You Can’t Take Back
  • New projects: Slip and WRECKED

♣ Contact me

sayhello (at) courtneymeaker (dot) com

♣ Blogroll

  • 365 Plays
  • Arts Crush
  • Catherine Blake Smith
  • Danny Fisher-Bruns
  • Ian Klein
  • Kelli Refer
  • Kj Swanson
  • Shasti
  • Tom Fucoloro

♣ Calendar

April 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

♣ Archives

♣

♣ RSS

RSS Feed

Courtney Meaker is a Seattle dramaturg and director who blogs about current projects and productions

Pages

  • About
  • Approach
  • Plays
  • Past Projects
    • The Skriker
    • Hamlet
    • Vinegar Tom
  • Resume
  • Current Projects

Recent Comments

  • cmeakdramaturgy on Peregrine Sonata January 13th – 15th
  • Julie on Peregrine Sonata January 13th – 15th
  • Kj on Seattle Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream
  • » OSF’s August: Osage County Courtney Meaker on Collektor’s Lie of the Mind at ACT Theatre
  • Kj on Why is Pygmalion still produced?
sayhello (at) courtneymeaker (dot) com

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.